Intolerance of Intolerance

What if your cause doesn’t have many supporters?  Smaller numbers have to take on more extreme tactics or make more outlandish claims in order to win the kind of attention that those large demonstrations on the Washington mall get.    A handful of protesters milling on the mall won’t make news.  Disruption does.

So, the Westboro Baptist Church, of Topeka, Kansas, hit upon the idea of staging anti-gay demonstrations outside the funerals of soldiers, sailors, or marines killed in combat.  The point wasn’t about the serviceman’s background (which church members never knew), so much as Pastor Fred Phelps vehement opposition to homosexuality.   Small numbers disrupted the solemnity that normally attends funerals, and  broke into news coverage by their sheer daring and outlandishness.  This is hateful stuff.

Ah, but it works.  Think of lunatic Pastor Terry Jones’s threat to burn copies of the Koran–drawing attention to himself and his tiny congregation that he never could have attained with more conventional spiritual pursuits.  Or think of the few individuals so opposed to the Vietnam war that they self-immolated near the White House.  The smaller the numbers, the more dramatic the event has to be to get attention.

The Supreme Court is about the consider whether Westboro’s demonstrations are protected as free speech.  According to CBS (source of photo as well),

The church’s lawyer, Phelps’ daughter, Margie, says the church holds the protests to make their point that U.S. deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq are punishment for Americans’ immorality, including tolerance of homosexuality and abortion, and therefore fall squarely under the protection of the First Amendment.

The plaintiff, Albert Snyder, sued for damages because of the disruption at his son’s funeral.  It’s not hard to imagine his grief and anger.

If the long route through the legal system provides slow and uncertain remedies to Westboro’s offense, others have found alternative methods.   The Patriot Guard Riders, a group that includes many veterans, rides motorcycles, at the request of families, at the funerals of servicemen.  Of late the riders have been idling aggressively to drown out intolerance, Ambreen Ali reports:

“There’s very few things on Earth louder than a V-Twin Harley Davidson,” said Dylan Waite, an Army first lieutenant and Patriot Guard volunteer who used his car alarm to contribute to the noise.

 

Advertisements

About David S. Meyer

Author and professor of Sociology and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Intolerance of Intolerance

  1. Lukas says:

    “Ah, but it works.”

    Can you define ‘works’? Is there evidence to suggest that this type of extreme tactic (attacking widely respected/revered targets to draw attention to an essentially unrelated issue) has been successful for Phelps (or any other less loathsome social movement using a similar tactic)?

    Possible desired outcomes might be mobilizing resources, attracting membership, changing public opinion, or influencing policy. Does this tactic achieve any of these (or any other desired goal for a movement?)

  2. Interesting post! Small groups may use disruptive or abhorrent tactics to capture attention, but I’m also wondering whether they achieve any substantial gains beyond the news cycle. I’ve just been re-reading Lohmann’s informational cascade/signaling model. She would argue that the public will discount the participation of extremists & these groups are therefore unlikely to attract more supporters (and thus real influence) — at least unless/until moderates are drawn to their cause.

  3. Deana Rohlinger says:

    This is a good reminder that disruption is sometimes a goal and that groups can actually strengthen their identities when they are thoroughly rejected by broader culture. I think that these actions are primarily designed to reinforce group identity and resolve. Public rejection of the Westboro members and their tactics confirms their belief that they are righteous and going to heaven, while the rest of us burn in hell. I find Phelps’s strategic shrewdness terrifying.

  4. Pingback: The Phelps Family and the Supreme Court | Politics Outdoors

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s