The protest(s) sessions and what comes next

Unlike most of his would-be Cabinet mates, Attorney General-designate Jeff Sessions has filed his ethics and financial disclosure forms. When Senate committee hearings began this morning, his opponents were ready.

Lisa Desjardins, from PBS Newshour, posted the welcome Senator Sessions received from the gallery.

You’ll note that the faux Klansman was removed pretty quickly, but the maroon Statue of Liberty, surely no fan of the senator, was allowed to stay–at least for a while. Sessions’s opponents–and there are plenty of them–waited until the hearing resumed, then popped up, one or two at a time, to lodge their charges from the gallery until they were removed. This “popcorn” protest can go on for a long time, interrupted, delaying, and inflecting the hearings.

Senator Sessions was pressed by both the protesters and tough questions from Democrats on the committee, who had themselves been pressured by email and calls from activists demanding a strong stance against the appointment.  Sessions felt compelled to announce his support for civil rights, voting rights, Supreme Court precedent, and the rule of law generally. He certainly knew this was coming, and prepared for it. Indeed, the NAACP staged a sit-in at one of his home offices a week ago (below).

Congressional hearings, confirmation hearings in particular, present a relatively compact stage for activists to advance their claims. The presence of opponents, elected officials, and media–against the backdrop of the Capitol, make for good drama and viral video.

The turbulence probably won’t stop Senator Sessions’s confirmation as Attorney General. Republicans enjoy a majority in the Senate, and he is apparently well-liked by his colleagues. There are no public reports of personal corruption or impropriety–charges of racism set aside. But the potential impact of a protest like this one–and there are likely to be many like this confronting most, if not all, of Trump’s appointees–plays out over a much longer time than the drama of a hearing, or even the days-long deliberations in the larger Senate.

Taunts and tough questions elicit qualifiers and assurances that might actually affect the way Attorney General General Sessions does his job; more likely, they’ll provide a recent and accessible record of almost promises that opponents can haul out when the Justice Department does anything like what the protesters fear. Most likely, they’ll elicit clear statements about the nominee’s views on immigration, reproductive rights, and access to voting that organizers can use to mobilize more opposition.

The point: although it’s easy and natural to focus on the drama of the moment, demonstrations like this only really matter in the context of much longer and varied campaigns; but, they really can matter.

About David S. Meyer

Author and professor of Sociology and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The protest(s) sessions and what comes next

  1. Jason Werbics says:

    For those who believe in individualism, egalitarianism, freedom and democracy 2016 was a banner year for us in the Western world.

    In America, the long march of socialism (progressivism) has come to an end.
    You could say, it hit a wall.

    In Europe in 2016, it can be rightly said that solidarity died, and was replaced with a new postmodern path because of Brexit.

    Can 2017 be just as good?

    Professor Meyer brings up the point that the confirmation hearings of President Trump’s cabinet brings with it the opportunity to begin a broader campaign of resistance against the Trump administration. But is this really the only place that liberals should be looking in terms of political campaigns?

    With the outright rejection of the socialist (progressive platform) by the American electorate, it is time for the liberal in America to re-asses the failed relationship with today’s progressive. The current path for social justice in America has been shown to lead only to a political dead end.

    The liberal in America needs to make a clean break with the diminished forces of progressivism in America and it can do this by kicking them out of the Democratic Party. And in doing so, the liberal can also purge themselves of that ideology that continues to clash with an American liberalism so eloquently expressed by Louis Hartz in his work, The American Liberal Tradition.

    J.R. Werbics is a Canadian filmmaker, writer and philosopher

  2. I guess I read the Trump win a little differently than you do. He campaigned for an interventionist and aggressive government, albeit one directed by him–ostensibly channeling the needs of THE PEOPLE. I think this is ridiculous. And, as troubling as his election is for tens of millions of people,politics continues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.