It’s never one thing: violence in Baltimore

A lot of things have to go wrong for protests to turn into sustained violent confrontations with the police–as in Baltimore today.  The reports on the repeated protests against police

Baltimore police rush at protesters during clashes in Baltimore, Maryland April 27, 2015.(Reuters / Shannon Stapleton)

violence last week emphasized that the overwhelming majority of the demonstrators were determined to be non-violent, and that scattered attempts at provocation by a few provocateurs–maybe from out of town–were isolated from the much larger protest actions.

The death of Freddie Gray was the last straw–until the next last straw.  Picked up with a knife, Gray died because police delayed in getting him medical care–a fatal error local authorities have already admitted–and an investigation continues.  But Gray’s death comes in the context of a police force that has paid nearly $6 million in civil settlements for beatings and abuse, mostly to young black men who were not charged with crimes.  (See the Baltimore Sun investigation.)  And it’s not just the money, of course; each beating wounds not only one victim, but the relationship between police and the community they’re charged with protecting.  And it’s not just policing; years of gentrification and development of the Baltimore waterfront haven’t spilled over to produce good jobs, schools, or services in most of Baltimore.

At this moment, the reports are that local authorities received “credible threats” that an alliance of criminal gangs was going to go after police.  The police showed up at Freddy Gray’s funeral prepared for a riot–a riot they ultimately got.  Speaker after speaker at the funeral called for peace–and justice.  At the moment, neither appears close.

A boy throws a brick at a police van, Monday, April 27, 2015, during a skirmish between demonstrators and police after the funeral of Freddie Gray in Baltimore. Gray died from spinal injuries about a week after he was arrested and transported in a Baltimore Police Department van. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

A boy trying to shot put a rock at a police van must be terrifying to police, who know that someone bigger may be pushing something bigger. The police surely know that the world is watching and that there are all kinds of ways that they can’t respond, but they don’t know who else is out there and what other weapons the few rioters might have.  They see vandalism and they see officers wounded.  I don’t know if they see a way out.

We remember how much we take for granted about public order.  In a city of more than 600,000, how many people does it take to bring havoc to the streets, to poke and prod officers with riot gear into reaction and overreaction?  Mobilizing neighboring police forces and the National Guard, imposing a curfew, and promising to deploy a panoply of violent means to one-up the rioters, Baltimore police announced their determination to keep order:

“You’re going to see tear gas. You’re going to see pepper balls. We’re going to use appropriate methods to make sure we can preserve the safety of that community,” a spokesman, Capt. J. Eric Kowalczyk, said at a news conference.  (New York Times)

Some brave Baltimore citizens, including clergy, also tried to control the moment, putting themselves between rioters and police, and urging the young people to back off.  It is, after all, their community.  And this might have had some effect.

Police preserve the social order when they can separate a relatively small number of miscreants from the larger community, and when that community is convinced that the social order is worth defending.  At the moment, however, many peace-loving citizens of Baltimore are hard-pressed to throw their lot in with the police.

Meanwhile, a baseball game at Camden Yards is canceled (read the reaction of the executive vice-president of the Baltimore Orioles, John Angelos, who emphasizes that there are bigger issues than baseball at play here). School is canceled tomorrow.  I’m sure almost everyone in Baltimore wants the riots and the fires and the rocks to stop, but I’m not sure going back to the normal before Freddie Gray’s death is any kind of goal.

About David S. Meyer

Author and professor of Sociology and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s never one thing: violence in Baltimore

  1. olderwoman says:

    The police interpretation of the gang truce as a violent mobilization is a stretch. Of course the truce was anti-police, in the same way all the protests are anti-police, that is, against police violence and police acting like an occupying army. The problem is police who can imagine only two states for the public: utter submission and docility, or violent rebellion. There are accounts out of Baltimore of the police provoking a riot, because a riot supports their stance that police violence is appropriate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.